Monday, July 30, 2007

WOTS WINNERS 2007


Ladies and Gentlemen,

We are proud to announce our WINNERS.

WINNER

Exit Marlowe
Matthew Scarsbrook

A wonderful script. It's THE FUGITIVE with Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeare teaming up to expose a conspiracy. Cracklin' good writing and adventure.

RUNNER UP

Something for Me
Juan Sebastian Jacome

An excellent Latino-themed drama reminsicent of HUSTLE AND FLOW in its unflinching look at hard-knock characters in a difficult situation, with out of this world writing.

SECOND RUNNER UP

Sole Pursuit
Jason Siner

Top-notch action thriller with a strong female protagonist. Inventive action and solid characterizations make this one not only a great script but appealing to the industry and a career launcher.

Congratulations to all our top ten and all our contestants!

--Jim Cirile

2007 WOTS Winners Coming 12 noon PST 7/30

Stand by...

Saturday, July 28, 2007

And the WINNERS are...

Fooled you, huh? Not yet! But we are getting very close. Can't you just feel the anticipation? By this time Monday we will have chosen the winner of Writers on the Storm for 2007. I have a pretty good idea who it will be, but we're having one more team meeting tomorrow to wrap it up. In my mind, right now, it's really choosing #2 and #3 that will be tough.

Hints?

Well... no.

But I can tell you that... er, no, actually, can't tell you that either.

Well, let's just say the winner--nope, can't go there.

Sigh. Sorry, guys. Anyway, sit tight! The winners coming at you VERY SOON.

--Jim C.

Friday, July 20, 2007

Writers on the Storm Top Ten in Depth



By Portia Jefferson

Hi, Stormies!

On behalf of the WOTS administrative staff and our fantastic team of professional readers, I want to thank everyone who entered this year's Writers on the Storm Screenplay Contest. It was a pleasure reading your scripts! As mentioned previously, the general quality of scripts from all entrants was at a higher level than last year, and we were impressed with much of the writing. It was a difficult task making each of the cuts -- Quarterfinals, Semifinals and Top Ten. At some point, it does become a subjective process, but that is how the industry works -- your script has to appeal to that one person (producer, agent, manager, studio exec. etc.) who holds it in his or her hands. Many entries had great concepts, but
the execution was not strong enough to move it forward. Many other entries had great writing, but the story had a weak narrative drive or was unfocused and/or unclear.

If you were eliminated in our first round, does that mean either you’re a lousy writer, or we’re idiots? Oftentimes the difference between a “pass” and a “consider” is one rewrite that solves a key story problem, or one adjustment to your craft that makes the read snappier, punchier, more dynamic. If you keep working on the craft, keep developing your stories and rewriting them, making them as strong as possible, your chances of success will rise, even as others give up and pull out.

Everyone will tell you how hard it is to break into this industry, but actually it's quite easy -- write a great script. Not an okay script, not a good script -- a great script. Write something so strong that it will be impossible for someone to turn down. Make it a page-turner. Easier said than done, right? Right. It is a wonderful achievement to simply finish a screenplay -- it is so difficult. Everyone should feel proud. But just because you made it to page 120, does that mean it’s ready to kick booty? If you’re like me, you probably have about 10 or 12 more
drafts to go first. Seriously! Hey, that’s just me. Maybe with y’all it’s only 6 or 7 ;)

Now, go... write, write, write, and... make it great!

Below are the loglines for the Top Ten scripts along with some of my comments. Not only is the writing exceptional on these scripts, but also the concepts are strong and the execution near flawless. We are in the process of rereading these scripts... and we will have another very tough decision to make on July 30th as we select our WINNER and two runners up.

Congratulations to the Top Ten Finalists - you deserve it!

The Writers on the Storm 2007 Top Ten, in alphabetical order by title:

1) BEDLAM by Dennis Shutty
Logline: A tabloid reporter unravels a 300-year-old mystery.
Genre: Supernatural Thriller
Comments: The script has great suspense and intrigue. Dramatic tension is strong throughout the story -- the readers were engaged on every page. There are a number of good surprises and twists which also make it a fun read. The "supernatural" element is unique and woven nicely into the narrative. The industry is always looking for great thrillers (and comedies) and this story should attract interest.

2) EXIT MARLOWE by Matthew Scarsbrook
Logline: 1593, Elizabethan England. The playwright Chris Marlowe struggles to expose a conspiracy against him before he is executed for atheism.
Genre: Historical thriller
Comments: We received a large number of period pieces, which typically do well in contests but do not garner much interest from the town because they are expensive and have limited audience appeal. But, there are some stories that are so compelling that even though it is set in the past, are too strong to overlook. This is one. Strong writing, strong story, strong execution.

3) FAMOUS NEIGHBORS by Patrick Baggatta
Logline: Two rival couples battle it out for the attention of the celebrity couple who just moved into their high-rise apartment building.
Genre: Comedy
Comments: We were surprised because of the small number of comedies submitted this year. Comedy still is king in this town, and if a writer can "write funny" then he will have a good shot at success. This is an energetic, fun, lively script that sucks you in, and the author has a strong comedic voice.

4) GRAVE CONSEQUENCES by Curt Burdick & Scott Burdick
Logline: Two ex-cons work in a graveyard - robbing graves. But "all hell breaks loose" when they rob the jewels of a famous dead gypsy.
Genre: Supernatural Comedy
Comments: Another strong comedy -- with a wonderful supernatural element to it. The authors are extremely inventive. The story is fresh -- we had not seen a story like this before, and there are some great twists. Funny!

5) MS. HALL OF FAME by Raenell D. Jones
Logline: Athena Michaels’ love for football leads her on a difficult task to reach her goal to join the NFL.
Genre: Family drama/Sports
Comments: This is a strong premise. A sports story that also appeals to family -- which makes it extremely attractive to potential buyers. There is a strong female protagonist (African-American) whom the readers could not help but root for. That's what you want with a good script -- a protagonist whose goal is clear and that the audience can get fully invested in. Story is clear, simple, fun and... emotional.

6) ORIGIN by John Unger Zussman and Patricia Zussman
Logline: A biopic about Darwin and the story of his life during the years that he was writing (living) The Origin of Species.
Genre: Biopic/Period Drama.
Comments: Another strong period piece -- from our Writers on the Storm 2006 runner up. This one is a biopic on Charles Darwin. The authors did a tremendous job of researching Charles Darwin's life, his work and getting to the heart of his theory. The story is also important and resonates today. Excellent writing, excellent subject, wonderful execution.

7) SOLE PURSUIT by Jason Siner
Logline: Female bounty hunter struggles to go it alone after her husband and partner is killed. While pursuing a prison escapee, she finds herself up against a corporation that's hiding the convict's location to protect a deadly secret.
Genre: Crime thriller
Comments: An engaging, entertaining action thriller by 2004 CS Open Winner Siner. This one has a strong, empowered female lead and a handful of exciting action set pieces. The author has a wonderful writing style and clearly is strong in the crime/action genre. A page-turner.

8) SOMETHING FOR ME by Juan Sebastian & Jacome Moreano
Logline: A selfish and rebellious Ecuadorian single mother learns to care about her nine-year-old child as she struggles to migrate to the United States.
Genre: Drama
Comments: An awesome story set in a unique world. Great, complex characters with a strong emotional underbelly. The mood and atmosphere are both solid, as is the conflict/tension throughout the story. Story is fresh and the combined voice of the authors is unique, fresh and emotionally gripping.

9) SULTANA by Laqueta Lewis
Logline: An Islamic queen struggles to retain her power and sanity as she finds herself ruling Egypt in the midst of a Crusader invasion.
Genre: Period Drama
Comments: This writer had two other scripts that could have been in the Top Ten. She is an exceptional writer. Each of the scripts she submitted to us were very well-written, compelling, and were executed at a high level. Of her three scripts, this one was the one that had the most promise commercially (as well as being the best overall story). Everything from the locations to the dialogue feels totally authentic and believable. A joy to read.

10) TWAS NIGHT BEFORE THE NIGHT BEFORE CHRISTMAS by Lee Tidball
Logline: Christmas barely survives when Santa is waylaid by an evil elf and his rebellious teenage daughter Sandi, who takes over, uses the toy run to get to a Christmas Eve talent competition that she's in.
Genre: Family Holiday Fantasy
Comments: Christmas scripts are a tough sell because producers, execs etc. put them in a special "seasonal" pile that they may, or may not, ever get to. Also, Christmas stories all tend to have familiar elements. Not this one. This is fresh, fun, and very engaging. It is hard to create something unique in this overdone genre, but the author has done so. The characters are all strong. Very merry and jolly!

Good luck to the Top Ten!

Monday, July 16, 2007

Like A Dog With Chocolate

Like a Dog with Chocolate: Why I Keep Coming Back to NY Indie Film (Even Though It Makes Me Sick)

by Aaron F. Schnore

I once read this great David Lynch quote, where the iconoclastic director explains why he keeps returning to TV despite repeated failures. I'm paraphrasing here, but Lynch said he's like a dog with chocolate. He knows TV (the chocolate) is gonna make him violently sick, but he just can't stop eating it. I can relate. If I'm a dog, then New York independent film is my chocolate.

My name is Aaron F. Schnore and I'm human. I've lived in NYC for the past 11 years. I started writing scripts ten years ago when my step-brother and I wrote an oddball script called LUST AND RUST AND ROY over e-mail. It wasn't so much a script -- it was more like a weird prose poem in screenplay format. In other words, it sucked. But it actually got a few nibbles (and prompt rejections) from producers. When I got that first voice mail from a producer requesting LUST AND RUST AND ROY, I'd tasted the chocolate. And it made me sick. But to this day, I keep coming back.
I've known Jim Cirile for most of my screenwriting career, and like many of you, he's my go-to guy for script solutions. I consider Jim not only a friend and an amazing screenwriter, but also a mentor. I'm also proud to call Jim a collaborator after we recently co-wrote and co-produced a comedy short film called SHOWDOWN OF THE GODZ, co-starring George Takei (a/k/a Mr. Sulu from STAR TREK). When Jim asked me to write an article for the CI newsletter, discussing the ups and downs of writing (mostly) independent film scripts for New York producers and directors, I was honored. But let me say upfront, I have no beef with big, Hollywood studio filmmaking. On the contrary, I would LOVE to sell a mega-budget, Will Farrell vehicle optioned to a huge studio for high six figures. I've written a few big budget specs. But most of my scripts are New York-based, low-budget independent film projects. It's the world I know.

Some back story. A huge milestone occurred for me back in 2002. I had just gone through a painful separation and 9/11. Life sucked. But then my collaborator Billy Fox became Top 50 finalist in Project Greenlight for our screenplay MANTECA, a period piece about the legendary, hard-living Cuban percussionist and composer Chano Pozo. I'd had some success with screenwriting competitions in the past, but nothing like this! I was rejuvenated. Around this time, I also met a cool and talented Haitian-American film director named Phil Roc. We clicked, and almost immediately we wrote this gay/teen-themed indie script called CRAZY IN HEAVEN. I pitch it as "BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN meets KIDS". CRAZY became a Top 20 Final Draft finalist, a Sundance Lab finalist, and got a lot of nibbles from legitimate production companies. Then MANTECA got optioned by an upstart prodco in L.A! Another one of my scripts -- a big-budget drama about a middle-aged woman with a gambling addiction called PLAYING WITH THE QUEEN OF HEARTS -- was getting major heat from Lifetime. Olivia Newton-John was interested in the lead role! After years of spec scripts, contests, and query letters, things were looking up. Damn, that chocolate tasted good.

Unfortunately, things turned... bitter. MANTECA went into turnaround, and the upstart production company dissolved. CRAZY IN HEAVEN generated a huge buzz, and had an Oscar-winning producer attached and championing it like Ari from ENTOURAGE, but no producers (big or small) thought the "gay teen" theme would play in the red states. We got more passes than Terrell Owens. Then Lifetime passed on QUEEN OF HEARTS because they were committed to producing a Delta Burke film about -- what else? -- a middle-aged woman with a gambling problem!!! Great.

Did I stop eating the poisonous chocolate? Hell no. Phil Roc (my CRAZY IN HEAVEN co-writer) and I decided to make our own short film. With some help of my girlfriend Johanna Lewis, Phil and I wrote a script called AVENUE X (which you can watch at the AVENUE X website HERE), a drama/comedy about two deaf NYC teenagers who take an adventure-filled day trip to Coney Island to ride The Cyclone. We cast two real deaf teens, shot the film with a skeleton crew in two hectic days, cut almost every corner imaginable. We shot most of AVENUE X guerilla-style. Two scenes were shot in the wee hours on the NYC subway, including one with my sleep-deprived daughter (5 at the time) with yours truly playing her grouchy dad. For the film's most notorious scene, our fearless cinematographer Al Pollard snuck a camera on to The Cyclone. Those were two of the most punishing days of my life. It was unbearably hot, and Phil yelled at me constantly for my rookie errors as a de facto PA/script supervisor/actor. But those were also two of the best days of my life, and AVENUE X went on to premiere at the Tribeca Film Festival, screened at dozens of other festivals, and it won a bunch of awards. Phil, Johanna, and I also wrote a feature version of AVENUE X which we want to leverage into a feature film (a la great indie films that started as shorts, like RAISING VICTOR VARGAS, SAW, NAPOLEON DYNAMITE, HALF NELSON, etc.). More significantly, making AVENUE X taught me a valuable lesson: I CAN MAKE MY OWN DAMN FILMS!!!

Two years later, I'm still following the same strategy: making my own New York indie short films, and backing 'em up with a killer feature script. I've cowritten/coproduced three short films since AVENUE X. There's the hip-hop/horror short RHYME ANIMAL, co-written with Billy Fox and Jorge Rivera, the story of a cannibalistic rapper who devours his groupies and rivals. We have a feature version in script form, and we're generating some considerable film festival buzz. I also co-wrote the NYC-based medical drama WHITE CURE (renamed SCIENTIFICO) for the German/Italian director Fernando Scarpa, which also has a feature script version attached. And of course, there's SHOWDOWN OF THE GODZ, due to start hitting festivals this winter. Standing on set, watching my childhood hero GEORGE FREAKIN' TAKEI, read lines I'd co-written was euphoric. At that moment I realized that even though screenwriting hasn't allowed me to quit my day job (yet), I've made progress in the past 10 years. Keep eating the chocolate.
My overarching goal now is to make a feature film by any means necessary. Seriously. This MUST happen by 2008, even if I shoot my own damn feature with a cell phone camera, in my small Manhattan apartment, starring a sock puppet. Fortunately, I have something slightly bigger in the works with my good friend Rik Cordero, a talented, renegade indie film director from Queens who shot his first no-budget feature film MEND when he was 25 years old. Rik's one of the hardest-working, most passionate filmmakers I've ever known. He personifies what New York independent filmmaking is all about: getting films made NOW. To check out some of Rik's work and reel, go to www.three21media.com. Earlier this year, we co-wrote a low-budget feature script (in one week) called INSIDE A CHANGE. Indie film gods willing, INSIDE A CHANGE goes into production this fall. Jamie Hector from THE WIRE is attached to co-star, and I'm beyond psyched. Wish us luck, and check out www.insideachange.com" for updates.

I'll conclude with some friendly, unsolicited advice to all the future Charlie Kaufmans out there. First, keep writing your big-budget, SFX-laden, multi-million dollar "tentpole" screenplay. Close that six-figure deal. Be the next Shane Black! But... whether you live in NYC, Los Angeles, or Dothan, Alabama... you should also consider augmenting your screenwriting portfolio with a self-produced, independent short film. What do you have to gain? A lot! Credibility. Great contacts at film fests. Self-confidence. Something tangible that industry folks can WATCH and EXPERIENCE. You don't have to live in NYC (in fact, it's better if you don't -- this city's expensive!). You don't have to have a lot of money -- hell, we made AVENUE X for under 2 grand. You just need a great story, an awesome team, and the will to get it done. One more thing -- before you shoot your short film, make sure the script ROCKS. Get coverage from Coverage, Ink... feedback from friends... from someone. Finally, keep eating that chocolate. It's good for you. Really.

You can contact Aaron F. Schnore at schnore@gmail.com and read more about him here.

Saturday, July 14, 2007

I Wanna Be Seared

by Jim Cirile

Hard to believe it was 20 years ago. There I was, fresh out of college, looking for a job, when the opportunity of a lifetime dropped into my lap. I got wind of a small-time film company in New York City that was looking for an office boy. So I hopped on the Metro North train at Crestwood/Eastchester station and trucked on down to the Century Paramount in Times Square, where, on the second floor of that venerable old hotel, Reeltime Distributing Corp. had its offices. There I met Walter Sear, the man who would, 20 years later, change my life.

Reeltime was a unique, remarkable place. Run by partners Sear and Roberta Findlay, it was a combination recording studio – a retro-embracing, all-vacuum tube haven (forget digital, this place didn’t even have transistors!) where artists such as Sonic Youth recorded – and a low-budget horror and, er, porno production company.


Uh, yeah, you read that right. See, I actually got the job because of my connex in that world. While in college I was the managing editor of “Adult Cinema Review Letters.” This was a digest-sized rag emulated (read: ripped off) “Penthouse Letters,” and thus was designed to be rife with erotic letters from fans fantasizing about their favorite porno actresses. Problem was, few people actually write letters to porno actresses (their writing hand is busy doing other things.) So while my job title was Managing Editor, what I really did was… write all the letters.

And so every month I typed up literally hundreds of pages of allegedly erotic content to fill this magazine. But here’s the thing. I’m a comedy writer. It quickly became tedious trying to play by the rules. By the second issue I had created a whole cast of recurring characters writing outlandishly silly (and decidedly non-erotic) crazy-ass stories about their misadventures to the likes of ‘80s porn queens Seka and Lisa DeLeeuw. By my third issue, the magazine was an out-and-out parody.

Amazingly, no one (except the paste-up guy, who was in on the gag and kept his mouth shut) ever read the magazine! And so I wrote whatever the hell I wanted. They finally caught me 8 months in. I was called down to the city for a meeting with the editor in chief, who looked extremely puzzled as he asked me, “Uh… what the hell is stuff???” At long last, they fired my sorry ass.

Anyway, back to Reeltime. This company had been making (very profitable, naturally) porno movies for a decade, and had only recently given up on porn to move into producing low-budget horror movies. Company founder Walter Sear saw the writing on the wall -- videotape was slowly killing off traditional theatrical porno film distribution. He decided ultra-low-budget horror movies were the way to go. Reeltime in fact was known for trying to bring decent production values and stories into their sex films (they actually built sets and had scripts), and several of their films had achieved industry acclaim. In the mid-‘80s, they produced their first two ultra-cheesy schlockers -- “Tenement,” about a murderous gang taking over a building and the occupants banding together to fight back – and “The Oracle,” a “Witchboard”-like tale of a Ouiji board gone amok.
Enter young Jim. At first, I had no idea what to make of these two chain-smoking mavericks. Findlay had a love of Hitchcock and was desirous of being a real filmmaker; Sear was a classically trained musician who helped develop some of the very first analog synthesizers with Robert Moog. And here they were churning out schlock, quite profitably.

As all young assistants do, I started out answering phones, running errands, and learning as much as I could about the business. But as the company ramped up their next under-$100,000-budget horror film, BLOOD SISTERS, my destiny revealed itself. It became clear that Sear was a master low-budget producer. When it came to getting maximum production value on the screen on the cheap, no one could touch him. While no one will ever accuse any Reeltime film of actually being any good, the fact that they were professionally shot and edited on 35mm for less than Michael Bay spends on one day of catering is amazing. Sear was a wheeler-dealer, getting top-notch crew people to work at pennies on the dollar, negotiating locations on a wing and a prayer and knowing when to economize and when to spend a few bucks for an on-screen bang. Sear owned a complete camera and lighting package, too, and would jump right in there and hump equipment along with the crew.

After three years at Reeltime, I’d worked my way up to cowriter and associate producer on their films. All was going well. And then in the late ‘80s, I more or less sank the company.

I had been pushing Reeltime to expand from the shrinking low-budget horror market (foreign sales markets were drying up due to oversaturation of schlocky horror flicks.) My thinking was that Reeltime should rebrand itself as a quirky, cult-moviemoving indie. In order to do that, we made BANNED, a screwball horror comedy (which I wrote), about a young, Milquetoast jazz guitarist who becomes possessed by the spirit of a dead, psychotic Brit punk rock star a la Sid Vicious. It was like ALL OF ME meets REPO MAN. To their credit, Roberta and Walter rolled the dice and made BANNED with their own money. Unfortunately, they couldn’t give it away.
The problems were many. While the movie was pretty damn funny, it was also pretty damn crappy on a technical level. And I must take some of the blame, too, as the quirky script, while designed to be “bad-proof” due to its ruthless poking fun at itself, wasn’t all it should have been. And so the cult classic we were all hoping for hit the American Film Market with a tremendous thud. BANNED was the first film Reeltime made that they were unable to find any significant distribution for, foreign or domestic. Reeltime took a pounding.

Seeing the writing on the wall, I knew it was time to get out of Dodge. I’d gone about as far as I could at Reeltime, and one day as I was changing a flat on the George Washington Bridge entrance ramp in a blizzard, I decided that L.A. sounded like a fine place to be.

It was only after being in L.A. the better part of two decades that I really began to appreciate Walter Sear. Being out here as a screenwriter, it’s so far removed from the way we did things at Reeltime. Here, you write a script in a vacuum, send it to your people, hope it sells and that the assignment you’re counting on to make your car payment will actually come through. None of which has anything to do with actually making a movie.

Earlier this year I returned to the streets of New York as a low-budget writer/producer (producing the short film ‘Showdown of the Godz,’ featuring George Takei.) All those years working side by side with Walter Sear came back as if not a day had passed. We were making a movie by any means available. We had barely any money; we were running on fumes, humping heavy equipment up 4 flights of steps in a Harlem tenement and getting people to work for us at pennies on the dollar. It was magnificent.

At long last it became apparent to me just how satisfying it is to be Walter -- to actually get your hands dirty and get a damn movie made just by willing it to be so (and digging into your own pocket to make it happen.) Suddenly, the Reeltime paradigm seems pretty appealing to me – just make the damn movie, then take it to the film markets and sell it. If you build it, they will come. Sounds a lot more appealing right now than writing another new spec and hoping some jaded D-Girl likes it more than the 800 other scripts they got in that day. Now I am flush with grand visions of Coverage, Ink evolving into a Reeltime-like prodco, financing pictures on foreign presales, doing it our way -- and completely bypassing the whole studio system.

If only I can remember not to torpedo the company this time out.

And so, Walter Sear, my hat’s off to you. You were the real deal—an actual filmmaker, unlike so many of us here in Hollywood who are ‘in the business’ and have never even seen a C-stand or a bounce card before. Sure, many of those Reeltime films were lousy, and others were, well, even lousier, but that’s not the point. 20 years later, I can still go to amazon.com and buy BLOOD SISTERS. *That* is the point.

--Jim Cirile

Sunday, July 08, 2007

Writers on the Storm 2007 FINALISTS


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Sorry we were a bit late announcing these. Some of these were very tough choices. Ultimately we chose what we thought were the ten best-written, most innovative and creative scripts no matter the genre. And indeed, this list includes drama, period piece, comedy, thriller, horror and more! If your script is on the list below, congratulations! And if not, please know that there were some VERY tough choices we had to make.

Our winners will be announced July 30th.

Without further ado, here are the Writers on the Storm finalists (top ten) for 2007.

Jim Cirile,
Coverage, Ink/Writers on the Storm


BEDLAM by Dennis Shutty

EXIT MARLOWE by Matthew Scarsbrook

FAMOUS NEIGHBORS by Patrick Baggatta

GRAVE CONSEQUENCES by Curt Burdick & Scott Burdick

MS. HALL OF FAME by Raenell D. Jones

ORIGIN by John Unger Zussman and Patricia Zussman

SOLE PURSUIT by Jason Siner

SOMETHING FOR ME by Juan Sebastian & Jacome Moreano

SULTANA by Laqueta Lewis

THE NIGHT BEFORE THE NIGHT BEFORE CHRISTMAS by Lee Tidball

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

"Showdown of the Godz" logo revealed!

Hey, all, happy to present the logo for our soon-to-be-finished comedy short entitled SHOWDOWN OF THE GODZ, starring David Caseman, Alixx Schottland, introducing Ayla Guttman and featuring George Takei. The film will be hitting the festival circuit starting late fall. Enjoy!
Also coming soon (well, not really soon, probably in a few months, actually) is www.showdownofthegodz.com. We're going to try to make the web site really fun, with sci-fi and monster movie trivia contests and some other fun little goodies we have planned (budget permitting, of course.)

Friday, June 15, 2007

Writers on the Storm 2007 Semifinalists


Ladies and gentlemen, Writers on the Storm is please to announce our 2007 Semifinalists. These are the top 50 scripts we received. They are some wicked good scripts and some very, very good writers. If you are on this list, know that you've got the goods. If you're not, know that there were some tough decisions we had to make, with many quarterfinalists only narrowly missing the mark. Many of those are only a draft or a few tweaks away from being Top 50 material.

Now comes the really hard part--cutting this list down to the Top 10, which we will announce on July 6. Again our congratulations, and thanks to everyone who participated.

Alone by Tracey Thomas
Amazing Grace by Scort Burgin & David Robinson
American English by PJ Swinburne
American Game by Jeff McArthur
Back Bay by Will Pepper
Bedlam by Dennis Shutty
Beneath the Realm by Douglas Jackson and C.L. DiGiovanni
Bliss by Douglas Jackson
Canaries by Craig Cambria
Colored Water by Doug Pitman
Dogs of War by Nick Gregory
Emotica by Christopher Fry
ESU: Emergency Service Unit by Rob Samborn
Exit Marlowe by Matthew Scarsbrook
Famous Neighbors by Patrick Baggatta
Fire & Shadows by Laura Francheri
Flashback by Darryl Anka
Grave Consequences by Curt Burdick & Scott Burdick
Gruesome by Terri Zinner
How the Hell Did I Get Here? By Arie Kaplan
Jackson Hole by Don Balch
Jake and Juliet by Wendy J. Gayner & Aimee Pitta
Jawad Jarrar - A Love Story by Veronica Kincaid
Long's Peak by Lyda Phillips
Lowlifes by Brian Buccellato
Mortal Coil by Andrew Steven Harris
Ms. Hall of Fame by Raenell D. Jones
Nine Lives by Thomas W. Hibbard
Origin by John Unger Zussman & Patricia Zussman
Pericles by Stephen Groak & Mark Savage
Rasputin by Laqueta Lewis
Resurrecting Angel by Leslie Flannery
Ritornare by Mark Porro
SBF: Single Black Female by Monique Gramby
Seeping Lines by Karen Lukesh
Sole Pursuit by Jason Siner
Something For Me by Juan Sebastian & Jacome Moreano
Soul Catcher by Liz McDermott
Special by Kermet Merl Key
Sultana by Laqueta Lewis
The Crimson Mafia by Suzye Gardner Marion
The High Cost of Parenting by Michael D. Smith & Tracy Poverstein
The Magic Ring by Henderson Smith & Brett Smith
The Magick of Time by Patricia G. J Joyce
The Man Plan by Donna L. Miller & Stuart Miller
The Sailor's Loves by Marjory Kaptanoglu
Tomorrow by Doris B. Gill
Twas The Night Before The Night Before Christmas by Lee Tidball
Wanting Mor by Chris Knight
X's and O'Briens by George Krubski






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See what's free at AOL.com.

Friday, May 25, 2007

2007 Writers on the Storm Quarterfinalists


Ladies and gents, it is with great pleasure that I present you the Writers on the Storm 2007 quarterfinalists. These scripts represent the top 10% of our 947 submissions.

A hearty congrats to everyone who made it. If you are a quarterfinalist, your script will be read again as we cut this list in half in order to select our 50 semifinalists, which we will announce on June 15th. We will then narrow the field further and announce the top 10 by July 6th and the winners no later than July 30th. The feedback forms will go out on or before 6/1.

If you did not make the list, that does not mean we thought your script was rotten! A great many scripts in the “pretty good” range had to be cut. Many of those are just one or two drafts away from being in the top 10 percent range. Others needed more work, of course, but as superagent Emile Gladstone says, “Screenwriting is a craft. It can be learned.” For many folks it’s simply an education process—how to most effectively turn those good ideas into a screenplay, format it properly, etc., which can take years and years to master (I'm still working on it.)

Of course we here at CI try to provide gentle guidance and steer everyone in the right direction and not disparage or insult anyone. If you are serious about your writing and are really embracing the process, listening to constructive criticism and taking it in--then you’ve got what it takes, whether your script made the quarterfinals of our little contest this year or not.

Without further adieu, hare are the 95 Writers on the Storm quarterfinalists for 2007. Nice work, everybody!!!

--Jim Cirile


A Crime by Valor and Arms Will Pepper
A Snowball's Chance in Hell by Gregory Lane
Alone by Tracey Thomas
Amazing Grace by Scort Burgin & David Robinson
American English by PJ Swinburne
American Game by Jeff McArthur
Angels of he Lost City by Patricia Little
Ariadne’s Thread by Steve Callen
Assisted Living by Marc LaBelle
Bedlam by Dennis Shutty
Beneath by Douglas Jackson and C.L. DiGiovanni
Bliss by Douglas Jackson
Blood Royal by Joe Fordham & Mark Ellis
Buried Secrets by Carlos Calvo
Canaries by Craig Cambria
Catching Bullets by Max Miller & Stuart Miller
Colored Water by Doug Pitman
Dead by 11 by Art Blum
Devils’ Wheel by Chris Blanchet
Dogs of War by Nick Gregory
Dolcino by William Hunter Duncan
El Abogado by Laqueta Lewis
Emotica by Christopher Fry
ESU: Emergency Service Unit by Rob Samborn
Exit Marlowe by Matthew Scarsbrook
Famous Neighbors by Patrick Baggatta
Felix the Flyer by Chris Canole
Fire & Shadows by Laura Francheri
Flashback by Darryl Anka
Fortune Cookie by Murray Spitzer
Foundations by Tom Basham
Freshly Popped by Megan Parsons
God Damned Angel by Alex David
Grave Consequences by Curt Burdick & Scott Burdick
Gruesome by Terri Zinner
Hooverville by Anthony Nathan
How the Hell Did I Get Here? By Arie Kaplan
Jackson Hole by Don Blach
Jake and Juliet by Wendy J. Gayner & Aimee Pitta
Jawad Jarrar - A Love Story by Veronica Kincaid
Kung Fu Movie 3 by JD Hoang
Lions by Dave Hackett
Long's Peak by Lyda Phillips
Lovelocked by Wehrner Ovalle
Lowlifes by Brian Buccellato
Manzanar by Alan Sproles & Lizanne Southgate
Middle Man by Jay Curcuru
Mortal Coil by Andrew Steven Harris
Ms. Hall of Fame by Raenell D. Jones
Night of Reflection by Chris Cambria
Nine Lives by Thomas W. Hibbard
Of Human Bondage by Matthew Scarsbrook
Origin by John Unger Zussman & Patricia Zussman
Pentagon Possessed: A Neocon Horror Story by Thomas M. Sipos
Pericles by Stephen Groak & Mark Savage
Play Dead by Don Rosenblit
Playing With Fire by Jay Tormohlen
Porkchop & Slim by Seth Schader
Pretending to be American by Peter Yesley
Rasputin by Laqueta Lewis
Resurrecting Angel by Leslie Flannery
Ritornare by Mark Porro
Sanctuary by Chris Cobb
SBF: Single Black Female by Monique Gramby
Seeping Lines by Karen Lukesh
Sole Pursuit by Jason Siner
Something For Me by Juan Sebastian & Jacome Moreano
Sons of Carthage by Anthony Nathan
Soul Catcher by Liz McDermott
Special by Kermet Merl Key
Spirit of Mischief by James K. Shea
Splintered Porch by Dennis Douda
Sultana by Laqueta Lewis
Sunnyside Up by Seline Raffel
Tear Drop Land by Joe Gadreau
The Crimson Mafia by Suzye Gardner Marion
The Cutting Wind by Ian Noakes
The Enginist by Tim McGrath
The High Cost of Parenting by Michael D. Smith & Tracy Poverstein
The Magic Ring by Henderson Smith & Brett Smith
The Magick of Time by Patricia G. J Joyce
The Man Plan by Donna L. Miller & Stuart Miller
The Red Sea by Rob Samborn
The Sailor's Loves by Marjory Kaptanoglu
The Strange and Thrilling Adventures of... by Tim Christian & Jeff Beals
The Town Clown by Linda Brumfield
The Ugly Princess by Henderson Smith
Tomorrow by Doris B. Gill
Twas The Night Before The Night Before Christmas by Lee Tidball
Vesna's Beach by Natasha Blazic
Virgin Marie by Krista Zumbrink
Wanting Mor by Chris Knight
Where The Dead Go by Mark Elliot Kratter
Whistler's Ridge by Cynthia Webb
Xs and O’Briens by George Krubski

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Great American Pitchfest Interview



By Jim Cirile

We sat down recently with Signe Olynyk and Bob Schultz, partners in the Great American and Great Canadian Pitchfest, arguably the Rolls Royce of pitch festivals. The next Pitchfest rolls into the Universal City Sheraton in Los Angeles the weekend of June 22nd. Over 70 companies are slated to attend. And unlike other pitch fests that limit you to 4 or 5 meetings, with Great American Pitchfest, the average is 12-20 meetings, sometimes more! If you’ve got material you’ve honed to perfection (you have honed it to perfection, haven’t you?) and are now ready to approach the industry, there is no better, stronger, faster way to meet a whole room full of industry than the Great American Pitchfest.

Coverage Ink has been to many pitch fests over the past decade, but we really like the way these guys run their ship. That is why we approached them to be a cosponsor for our Writers on the Storm contest. Like CI, these guys are writers themselves and really do care about bringing quality and opportunity to the emerging writer. For more about the Pitchfest, including companies list & bios, and to enroll, please visit their web site HERE.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jim Cirile: Hi, guys. Tell us how this ball got rolling.

Bob Schultz: It was all Signe’s brainchild. I was at another event, and so was Signe, and she was trying to find volunteers to help the first Great American Pitchfest. She had already done one Great Canadian Pitchfest.

Signe Olynyk: This whole thing was really borne out of frustration. I went to other pitch fests, and I attended as a participant.

JC: So you’re a writer also.

SO: Yeah, I’m a writer and a producer.

BS: All of us who are involved with putting on the Pitchfest are writers. We pride ourselves on being by writers, for writers.

JC: Ooh! Just like us. In fact, that’s the Coverage, Ink slogan. Hey, copyright infringement!

BS: What I meant is for writers, by writers.

JC: Oh, okay. That’s a totally different thing then.

SO: We tell people this isn’t our Pitchfest, it’s everyone’s Pitchfest. We’re writers. We developed an event—well, for ourselves, really. We were trying to find something that helped writers and the producers connect in a way that we didn’t feel was being done.

JC: I’m a long-time veteran of a lot of pitch fests, and I’ve made a lot of good long-time industry contacts from them. Some people you sit with are a waste of time, but others, you really can make a connection. What weren’t you seeing from those other pitch fests that you wanted to bring to the Great American and Great Canadian Pitchfests?

SO: Well, let me give you some background on how this thing started. I was at the Screenwriting Expo the first year as a participant. I think the Expo is one of the best events out there for screenwriters, a fantastic event—if you’re a screenwriter, you’ve got to go.

JC: Plug, plug, plug. Go ahead.

SO: (laughs) I have no affiliation with the Expo.

JC: I do. It’s okay.

SO: Anyway, I really admire that whole event, but what I had a problem with was their pitch fest. I attended as a participant, and I stood in line that first year from 5:00 in the morning till 2:00 in the afternoon. You’re dressed up, you’re wearing your heels—well, maybe just me and Bob…

BS: Hey!

JC: Hopefully not matching.

SO: And to be honest, I was so frustrated by that experience—I missed all my training sections because I was in line waiting for my meetings. And then when it’s time for the meetings the next morning at 9:00, suddenly it’s 9:20, then it’s 9:40 (and there’s no movement.) Now there’s this backlog of people piling up in the room. They have these scheduled times, but nobody knows what time they’re really going in anymore.

JC: Now you’re talking about the first year, and it was completely disorganized on every level back then. It has gotten much better since then. I was coordinating the CS Open, and we had no idea what we were doing that year either, but now it runs like clockwork.

BS: That’s my favorite part of the Expo, by the way, the CS Open.

SO: The biggest difference is with our event, you don’t get a scheduled time. You don’t have to wait on line to book your time. What we do is we have 70 to 100 companies in one room, spread throughout. In the hallway outside, we have 70-100 corresponding lines. So let’s say you want to meet with Disney at table 30, you would get in line 30, and you would also turn to page 30 in your booklet, where you’d read a full profile about that company, their credits, what they’re looking for, the stars they have relationships with, really specific information.

BS: If you check out our web site, all the profiles from previous Pitchfests are up there.

SO: What you won’t find online is the contact information. You have to register to get the contact info for the executives.

JC: So how do you prevent somebody from taking 45 minutes once they sit down and grab somebody’s ear?

SO: We do have a general time, which is 5 minutes. But if that executive wants more time with you, all we do is hold the line. The execs can take as long as they want.

BS: We found that our participants, instead of being frustrated because they’re delayed, everyone’s really excited, because it means someone has generated interest, and everyone’s sort of rooting for each other.

SO: Plus writers are meeting on the lines, saying, “I just met with that company. What are they like? What are they looking for?” So they’re sharing a lot of things. We’ve had a lot of long-term relationships that have developed as a result.

JC: That also means a writer is not necessarily limited to only, say, four meetings.

SO: And in fact most of our participants get 12 to 20. There are some people who meet with every company there. I’m not kidding. They just keep getting in line. I think a lot of people just stop because they get tired.

BS: In the beginning, we have a lot of people who are rushing, because they are accustomed to rushing (at other pitch fests). So in the beginning it’s rush, rush, rush, and then after lunch and by the end of the day, we have people sitting down and saying, “You know what? I’m done, and there’s still half the day left.” They’re satisfied to the point of exhaustion. And I feel like that’s why we’ve had a lot of success getting return customers and production companies, too, because they get bang got their buck. The 20 pitch number that we throw around is not one of these extremely rare occasion things. It happens quite frequently.

JC: So tell us about some success stories that have come from all of this.

SO: We’ve got about 30 success stories—actually it’s higher than that, and these are just the ones we know of. We really rely on our executive and our participants to tell us. We’ve got over 30 confirmed success stories, and that’s where participants have sold their screenplay, had an option, or they sign with agents or managers or have been hired for writing assignments.

BS: My first internship, my first writing assignment for actual money, all came from the Great American/Great Canadian Pitchfests. I started as a volunteer.

SO: Most of the volunteers we have become a big part of our team, because they see (the benefits.) Lorene Lacey, same thing—she found an agent out of it.

BS: I’m going to be in LA next week doing some scene work on a film, and I met them through the Pitchfest.

JC: A lot of times companies will send the lowest guy on the totem pole—the plant guy, for instance—to pitch fests see if there’s anything out there, but these people aren’t really decision makers. I know that frustrates some writers. But on the flip side, eventually those guys will work their way up, and this is a chance to get in on the ground floor.

SO: We get a mix. We get studio execs who attend. Some of our best support has come from one of the execs at Fox.

BS: Also Imagine, and we get actors and their production companies, so we get someone who’s one person removed from the celebrity.

SO: I work really hard at making sure the people we have are credible. I also produce, so the contacts I have, I’m using them. I go to all the markets—NATPE, MIPCOM, and I meet these people and work really hard at establishing my relationships with these production companies.

BS: We also offer classes on pitching, so we’ve built a reputation with the decision makers so they know that a large percentage of the pitches they’re going to get are (not going to waste their time.) And we treat them like VIPs across the board. It gives us credibility. I feel like we do a really good job of getting decision makers at those tables who can actually make decisions. The people are pitching to someone who can affect their careers.

SO: And I think we’re the only pitch fest that does this—we ask the writers who attend to tell us who they want to meet with, and we invite those companies. So if you want the producers of “Kill Bill,” we go after them. We can’t promise, but we do our best to get them there.

JC: Thanks putting on a top-flight event. Do you have any parting advice for writers who are going to attend the Pitchfest? Other than being a good writer.

BS: You can never be too prepared. Although you said aside from being a good writer, that’s critical. But just as critical is selling yourself. You need to know your story. I know a lot of people are nervous. They feel like they’re putting on a performance when they’re doing their pitch. But when you only have five minutes, it’s more about having a good conversation and being yourself.

SO: Building a relationship.

BS: Yeah. Writers need to know their story well, be comfortable talking about their story, be able to answer questions and have fun. When you’re facing someone who could change your career forever, it’s hard to just kick back and relax, but all things being equal, if the executive has the opportunity to go with a project where they have a good rapport with the writer, they’re going (to hire that person instead of someone they’re uncomfortable with.) So just be yourself and have a good time. If you have five minutes with somebody, and after 15 seconds they say pass, that doesn’t mean the relationship has to end. If you have a good rapport, somewhere down the line you could just pick up the phone and call this guy because you’ve established a good relationship earlier.

SO: People like to work with people they like. I’m about supporting writers. I say go to every event you can, even our competitors’, because you never know when you might meet someone who can help your career.

BS: And I say buy as many tickets as possible for our event.

SO: (laughs) I know I’m totally biased, but our event really is the best one out there. We’ve made it that way. I’ve sat on both sides of the table. I know the frustrations I felt when I went to pitch fests as a producer, and you have to fight to get your parking covered or get some coffee or water, or they don’t tell you the right room to go to. It’s communication and organization, and those are things we’re really good at. We really try to make this rewarding for everyone.

Showdown of the Godz effects diary


Thought you guys might appreciate a look behind the scenes at the making of a special effects shot for Coverage, Ink's upcoming short film SHOWDOWN OF THE GODZ. Thanks to modelmaker extraordinaire Chuck Reina for posting this!

Click HERE to visit the site.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Quarterfinalists Coming In...


Hello, Stormies!

Just a quick update to tell you all that we are in the last stages of reading all the submissions to Writers on the Storm and will have the quarterfinalists posted on Friday 5/25. Those of you who entered through Coverage Ink already know if you made it to the QF round or not.

I'm not sure why, but the overall quality of all the submissions this year seems to have gone up. Maybe it's because you all are rewriting and honing these things more than ever -- I hope so! Whatever the reason, it's encouraging. I remember the first contest I ever worked for, I'd pick up a box of scripts and we'd be lucky if there was one in there worth advancing. With Writers on the Storm, we have the opposite problem!

More soon, so sit tight. And great work, everybody!

--Portia Jefferson
WOTS Contest Coordinator

Friday, May 04, 2007

Interview with PREY Creator Michael Lent


by Jim Cirile

Many of you know Michael Lent from his dearly departed "Belly of the Beast" column in Creative Screenwriting. Since leaving CS, Lent has been a busy lad -- writing and producing all sorts of cool book and movie projects. His graphic novel PREY - Origin of the Species -- is now available at fine comic book shops nationwide. We're also proud to say that Coverage, Ink helped develop this project! We caught up with Lent to talk about PREY and a bunch of other stuff.

Click HERE to watch the PREY trailer!

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Coverage, Ink: Can you give us a heads up on why you left CS and what you've been up to since?

Michael Lent: Two years ago, I went from columnist to Contributing Editor at CS so that I could focus exclusively on writing and producing. End result was that I joined the 33 Club. That is, producing three movies and writing three books in 24 months. I produced or co-produced Hard Scrambled, Witches' Night and Naked in America. The last two are in post-production right now. In addition to Prey for Marvel, I wrote two other books -- Christmas in Hell (Amazon Books) and a sequel, Christmas Letters from Hell to be published by Simon & Schuster in August '07. Currently, Brian McCarthy (Wide Awake) and I are collaborating on a cross-genre horror/Western film called Blackwater that we'd like to shoot in October.

Writing the Belly of the Beast column was an amazing experience, but after 8 years and something like 60 articles, I felt like I needed go back into the field full-time and have fresh experiences without the pressure to write about them in a journalistic sense. Likewise, I've been approached by a publisher to write a "take this and use it right now" Breakfast With Sharks-styled guide (Lent's excellent book on surviving the screenwriting life, available HERE) specifically for writer/producers, but I've declined for the above reasons. Maybe in another year or so.

CI: Prey: Origin of the Species was originally a big action spec script. Tell us what happened with it as a script, and how did it become a graphic novel?

ML: This is a good story if you're like me and love deconstructing the business side of writing. In July, 2004, I wrote Prey as a spec and turned it in to my agent. I waited the mandatory background check 10 days and then called him. Immediately, my agent starts waxing poetic about how great the script is -- "fantastic action, strong protag, cool storyline and excellent dialogue" and so on. Then there's a pause that I've learned from experience means "But ..." So I say, "But ..." and he says, "But ... What you've written is a big, expensive summer event film that's gonna cost about $110 million to make. These days, all the big event films are coming out of comic books and graphic novels. It's a shame you didn't have one of those behind this script because right now, there are only a couple of places I can take this to [since most prodcos are maxed out at $50 million]. It felt like a trap door had opened under my feet.

I think a mistake a lot of writers make it to take such a death pronouncement at face value, lick their mortal wounds and then go back to the drawing board. Me, I'm pretty stubborn, like a pit bull with a pot roast. They say "no," I hear "maybe," and keep on going.

Rest of the summer I kept turning what my agent had said over and over in my brain. Like a lot of screenwriters, I had loved comics back in high school but then put them aside for more "serious" reading once I started college. I'd basically lost touch with that medium and world so had no connections, but being somewhat resourceful, in September of 2004, I pitched CS publisher Erik Bauer about interviewing all the movers and shakers like David Goyer, the Wachowski Brothers, Kevin Smith and Joss Whedon who were riding the stampede convergence of movies, comics and games. Basically, Erik was nice enough to let me go back to school on the company dime. *-) The 2000 word piece appeared in December, 2004 and was well-received. Some of the guys who were interviewed said, "Hey, if you ever need anything ..." You should never say something like that to a screenwriter 'cause you just know that we're gonna make you pay up. So one of those guys read my script and then gave me a hit list of mid level publishers which I went out to after taking another pass through on the script. Part of that pass included: submission to CI which came back strong and had some great suggestions; a table read with actors and a firing squad of fellow writers. I figured that I needed some heat on the project so gave myself two weeks to do a final polish and then submitted the script to the Houston Worldfest competition where I'd won two top awards previously. It won the Gold Remi, and with that in hand, I went to the hit list. This was May of 2005.

Basically my pitch was that I was a Hollywood writer/producer with an original series already in good shape for a movie. For any indie publisher interested in a toe hold in Tinseltown this project would make a lot of sense. For Atlanta-based Dabel Brothers, it did and we cleared contracts in two weeks -- about three weeks after I'd won the Worldfest award. I really clicked with both Les and Ernst Dabel, and by end of June, we were already hiring artists and rolling up our sleeves to adapt the screenplay to comic script form which Mike Raicht, a former editor at Marvel, took point on. Lance Laspina, with X-Men and mad game industry credits, handled art direction.

The process itself was very similar to being in production on a movie. Les, Lance and Mike gave me a crash course in comics and I got up to speed pretty quickly. We were working with talent literally all over the planet and with five issues to produce, there was always something coming in or go out. Every morning I'd roll out of my bed and immediately turn on the computer before going to take a whiz. There'd be work or emails coming from the Philippines, South America, the UK and all over the US. I LOVED it.

CI: It took two years for Prey to get released--but now it's out and distributed by a little company called MARVEL. Must feel pretty good. But what took so long?

ML: The book was due out last June, but by then Marvel had expressed interest in merging Dabel Brothers into its publishing family. Turtles on Valium move faster than corporate mergers, so we had to patiently bide our time until last September. After that, it was just a question of lining up our place in the Marvel pipeline.

CI: Tell us what you think of the book -- what do you love about it? Anything that could have been done better?

ML: I'm thrilled with Prey: the book. Publishers Les and Ernst Dabel moved heaven and earth to make sure we had the best people. The result speaks for itself. Excellent art and production values right down to the paper stock and custom fonts. No compromises. Creatively, the book truly is its own entity. Artists Bong Dazo and Alex Sanchez are hugely responsible for that.

It definitely takes a small army to make a book like Prey. The process has been such an amazing journey that after awhile the book assumes its own identity apart from the creators.

CI: But the party's over for big action specs, huh? The economics have changed so that big budget action specs rarely sell unless they are from source material, and even getting agents to shop them is like pulling teeth.

ML: That's very, very true. But with Prey, you can produce and print it for $50,000, which is a lot of money to you and me and even Marvel, but isn't much by Hollywood standards where a studio exec's annual bottled water tab can exceed the GNP of Ecuador. However, any time someone makes an investment in a project, Hollywood sits up and takes note. Having a produced graphic novel means you're that much closer and further along in the process because the book is basically a story board of the potential movie. Studios can truly "see" the movie Prey now. Also, movies like Sin City and 300 prove that you can green screen a stylized visual adaptation for about half the price of a traditional genre film. So suddenly, Prey is viable at $55 million and audiences will accept its stylized look because it makes visual sense, whereas it might not without the underlying graphic novel.

CI: Do you have any other graphic novel projects coming down the pike?

ML: Yes, we're doing an issue #1 of Blackwater for Marvel and Dabel Brothers imprint. And I've also agreed to do another Project X graphic novel that we hope will be right for Samuel L. Jackson.

CI: You originally developed this script with CI. Did any further development take place? What changes had to be made for the graphic novel format?

ML: CI was a crucial part of the development of Prey. Again, the results speak for themselves. Besides CI, I went out to five trusted readers, plus did a table read with actors and colleagues. Writer/director/producer Travis Pike of the Alameda Writers Group (alamedawritersgroup.org) hosted a Whole Script group every couple of weeks and I workshopped Prey there. Community is so crucial. I built the project systematically and know that I had support the whole way. My name may be on the book but there are many, many people who contributed in large and small ways. To me, that's what it's all about. I love to create but the journey with my fellow travelers is really where it's at.

Adapting a screenplay into a graphic novel is a distillation process. Only the most quintessential visual and dialogue elements survive. Meanwhile, a little more exposition is required to help the 2-dimensional format along. Also, Prey the screenplay was written for a target audience of, say, 18-28, whereas most broad based graphic novels skew slightly younger. So we had to make script changes to compensate.

CI: Great stuff, Michael. We wish you continued success. Any parting advice for our readers?

ML: Never say die. Don't take crap from anyone who puts down your writing. Always believe in your work and have the patience and faith to make it all it can be. Give it every chance you can. Don't wait for your career to "happen." Modern Hollywood agents and producers aren't about building careers so much as validating success. That "success" isn't a sprint but rather an endurance race whose pace you alone set, which you run with your colleagues. That's what keeps me grounded when things get tough.

***

Thursday, May 03, 2007

Now THAT'S a Costume

I'm a comics fan, and my two favorite heroes have always been Superman and Iron Man, for completely different reasons. Supes because of his invulnerability, those iconic primary colors and his embodiment of both might and right... and Iron Man because the dude's an alcoholic and a regular joe (well, as much as a billionaire industrialist can be a regular joe) who builds himself his own freakin' superpowers. Totally different heroes, each representing a different type of wish fulfillment.

After the debacle that was last year's wretched "Superman Returns" costume... egads, could they have gotten a costume more wrong? Burnt umber instead of red, ugly pattern on the suit, teeny-tiny "S," obviously fake muscles and a rubber cape... I was a bit worried as to how director Jon Favreau's big screen version of Tony Stark's masterpiece of engineering would fare.

Let us know take a moment to bow down at the altar of Jon Favreau and designer Stan Winston. BEHOLD.


Everything about it is perfect. It's a fantastic amalgam of the Sean Chen/Patrick Zircher and Ari Granov Iron Man designs with a hat tip to the original '60s design by reverting back to the circular chest plate repulsor beam (never liked when the switch to the Superman emblem shape) and also incorporating some hinges to make the suit look as if it could actually work.

Winston hit a home run here. I can't wait for this movie! IRON MAN stars Robert Downey Jr. and Gwyneth Paltrow and hits theaters summer '08.

Read the article at Entertainment Weekly HERE!

--Jim Cirile

Saturday, April 28, 2007

The Exception to the Ensemble Epidemic Rule


I have a confession to make. It's not very often that I get addicted to a TV show. While I enjoy "Lost" and "Boston Legal," and a handful of others, there's been nothing that's really broken out for me from the 2006-2007 season... until "Brothers & Sisters."

This ABC dramedy portrays the huge, dysfunctional Walker family--every Walker except J.J., it seems--a well-off bunch with a recently deceased patriarch, all coming to terms with their own neuroses and crumbling relationships in the wake of dad's death. The performances are top-notch across the board--Sally Field, Rob Lowe, Rachel Griffiths, and seemingly half the cast of "Alias"--Patricia Wettig, Ron Rifkin and Balthazar Getty--not to mention the most neurotic of the clan, uber-Republican Kitty, played wonderfully by Calista Flockhart. The cast is so strong you almost forget that not a single one of these siblings looks ANYTHING like each other, and in fact Rachel Griffiths towers a good foot over Sally Field's head, her supposed mother. Whatever!

The writing is consistently amazing--dialogue full of subtext (a recent episode had cast members trading veiled yet stinging personal barbs while seemingly talking merely about wine) and emotion and humor. Another recent scene featured a cat fight between two characters that started off polite, then turned bitchy, then to physical violence, then to humor and finally to tears--all in the space of four minutes, and it WORKED. Wow. I bow in humility and respect to the writers.

And it is a true ensemble show.

Regular CI newsletter and blog readers, along with many of you who've gotten coverage from us, know how we feel in general about ensemble feature screenplays. (If you don't, please read 'The Ensemble Epidemic' HERE.) In short, next to Westerns, ensembles are probably the toughest type of spec script to get anyone interested in. The reason is that these projects, when they are made at all, and that is rarely, are generally auteur-driven, not originated as specs. And while I love Altman and "Crash" as much as the next guy, the market is not generally looking for ensemble dramas--or any dramas, since they are not rewarded at the box office. But far worse is that more often than not, an ensemble feature screenplay is indicative of an amateur writer who has not learned how to focus, how to tell a single story following a solo protagonist yet, and so the writer goes off on tangents following secondary characters like he would in a novel... the net result being the typical prodco reader loses focus on the protagonist and hurls the script into the recycle bin in about 12 pages.

So it dawns on me that I need to revise my opinion about ensembles, since I somehow overlooked one venue where they are alive and thriving -- TV. As "Brothers and Sisters," and indeed, "Lost" and "Boston Legal" and plenty of others show, television is where ensemble writing thrives.

So if you're writing a new feature spec screenplay and you find yourself thinking about taking the ensemble approach -- STOP. Do yourself a favor and make it a TV spec of your favorite hour-long drama, or make it into a pilot instead. It will be less work for you (48 pages instead of 110!)

But even better, it might even have a chance at getting set up, which your feature ensemble spec likely will not.

--Jim C.

P.S. Oh, I know "Brothers & Sisters" has won a lot of fans thanks to the plethora of beefcake on the show, too--whereas the female cast members in general are not, er, shall we say fantasy material. However the show recently added insanely gorgeous 21-year-old Emily Van Camp ("Everwood,") so us dudes have some serious eye candy, too ;) Watch "Brothers & Sisters" on free ABC-TV.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

That's a Wrap!


Writers on the Storm is now closed for submissions in 2007. Many thanks to everyone who participated! It's still to early to tell the total number of entrants since many will be arriving in the mail over the rest of the week, but it looks like we're right around the same as last year--about 900 or so entrants, possibly 1,000. We'll see!

Now it's time to get reading... Are there a few masterpieces in this enormous stack? Let's find out!

--Jim Cirile

PS: Had some Google/blogger difficulty last week, which explains why the comments do not appear on the posts below... and there's no way to recover them. Thanks, blogger! But it has been fixed, so comments should appear below.

Monday, April 09, 2007

CI consults on "My Life As A Dog" sequel

Every now and then we work on something that fills us with a sense of purpose and fulfillment and, well, makes us feel like we're actually doing something cool here. CI recently helped develop "Hair of the Dog," the sequel to "My Life as a Dog" for Swedish producer Thomas Allercrantz with original writer Reidar Jönsson. “My Life as a Dog” was nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Director (Lasse Hallström) Oscars in 1988 and is just a fantastic, must-see piece of cinema.
Jim,

I think the analysis is excellent! It could have been my own words :o )
Please forward my thanks and best regards to BF Esq.

I think the analysis will be a very good tool to sharpen up the script, which it clearly needs. It will be very interesting to see the reaction from the authors. I will keep you informed.

I am very glad that we have opened up a link to Coverage, Ink, and looking forward to continuous contact with you in this and other projects. It's to bad that you don't have any Swedish reading readers ;o ), or do you!? In any case I will be glad to recommend your service to other Nordic producers and writers.


Jim C. replies: Thomas, we are privileged and honored to consult on the follow-up to such a wonderful movie! I can't wait to see it on the big screen. Unfortunately we don't have any Nordic readers at this time, although I did write a Viking comedy once that fairly butchered Danish in an attempt to create a faux Old Norse! Do keep us posted on the project. Best regards, Jim

Sunday, April 08, 2007

LAST CHANCE TO ENTER WOTS!!!


Hey Stormies,

Portia here, your Writers on the Storm contest coordinator. Don't mean to panic anybody, but our contest is ending soon -- Sunday April 15th! No e-submissions will be accepted past 12 midnight on 4/15/07 (that's Sunday night/Monday morning). In other words, all y'all who've been scrambling to get those scripts tight enough to bounce quarters off of, well, get bouncing!

What's real interesting is that unlike last year's contest, this year we had a lot more people entering WOTS via submitting their script to Coverage, Ink for script analysis, and getting entered in the contest for free that way. In fact we've had over 200 submissions so far through CI! Of course, that's pretty smart, because those guys are getting a second chance -- you get to see what we think of your script and get our tips for correcting the things we find -- and THEN you can polish 'er up and send the script directly into the contest by the end date. Not sure, but I don't think any other contest gives you that sort of leg up.

Now of course, if any of you all send your script in for coverage this week, well, no leg up for you guys -- you'll get your analysis back after the contest end date (unless you do a rush,) which means... no chance to revise and resubmit. However, you will know much sooner than the regular WOTS contestants if you advance to the quarterfinal round or not -- since everyone who gets a 'consider with reservations' or better for script (I'll explain that further, below) is automatically advanced to the quarterfinal round. Folks who submit directly to the contest (at www.writerstorm.com) won't find out if they've made the quarterfinals until the main announcement, which I think is sometime in late May. Actually, it's May 25th, Portia -- Jim C. If you enter through CI and don't get a consider with reservations or better for script, you are eliminated. Sorry :( I know that hurts.

Now some of you all don't understand what we mean when we say 'consider for writer' or 'consider for script.' Let me explain how this works. At the end of a coverage report, your script is rated on the following scale: PASS, CONSIDER WITH RESERVATIONS, CONSIDER, STRONG CONSIDER, and RECOMMEND. And you receive this rating for both SCRIPT and for WRITER. In a nutshell, this tells you whether we think the material and the writer are 'there' yet, or if more work needs to be done -- and how much.

The vast majority of scripts are a PASS for both script and writer -- about 90%. Now this doesn't mean that we think the script stinks, or we think you can't write your way out of a Hefty Steel-Sak bag! This simply means that in its current version, we don't feel that the script is ready yet (well, it *could* stink, truth be told... but there's hope for us all with gentle, proper guidance!) And a PASS for writer doesn't necessarily mean you can't write worth a damn; it just means that your craft isn't quite at the level it needs to be -- yet. Heck, none of us start out as Susannah Grant or Frank Darabont -- there's a long, often painful (especially in my case) learning process involved; only over time and after much practice do most of us learn how to bring our 'A' game to the page.

CONSIDER WITH RESERVATIONS, or better, for script, means that we think your script is in pretty good shape, but could still use a bit of work. But it's a bit closer to the target. CONSIDER means, Damn! Nice job! This thing could get peoples' attention! Although even 'considers' often need some fine-tuning. Lastly, there STRONG CONSIDER, which is like saying, whoa, drop everything, this script is awesome! As for RECOMMEND, as JC points out in an article on the CI site, they are super rare. I've been reading scripts in this town for 3 different production companies for six years, and I have given out exactly one recommend!

You need to understand that when a reader gives a script a 'recommend,' she's pretty much pushing the red button. It means my boss is canceling his lunch plans to read the supposed masterpiece. Guess what happens if my boss doesn't agree with my opinion? I am toast. No, worse -- I am frybread. I am stomped-upon saltines. You get the idea. That's why even if a reader loves a script, she'll often hedge her bets and give it a 'consider' -- just in case others don't feel as strongly about it!

Now some people wonder, how come I got a 'consider with reservations' for writer, but a 'pass for script'? Well, that just means the reader thought you're displaying some good writing chops on the page, but the script isn't ready to rock and roll yet. And if you get a 'consider' for script but a 'pass' for writer? That translates to, fantastic idea for a movie, but the execution is not living up to the promise of the premise. You gotta work on your craft.

If any of you guys are still confused about all this, shoot me an e-mail and I will try to make it all make sense...

This leads me to the fun part: announcing our quarterfinalists to date! As of 4/7/07, the 2007 Writers on the Storm quarterfinalists (remember, these are folks who entered the contest through Coverage Ink) are as follows, in no particular order. And as always, I remind everyone we show NO favoritism to anyone who enters the contest via submission to Coverage, Ink - in fact, it's two different staffs of readers.

1) Devils’ Wheel by Chris Blanchet
2) Alone by Tracey Thomas
3) Assisted Living by Marc LaBelle
4) Pretending to be American by Peter Yesley
5) Dogs of War by Nick Gregory
6) Lovelocked by Wehrner Ovalle
7) Lowlifes by Brian Buccellato
8) Ariadne’s Thread by Steve Callen
9) Resurrecting Angel by Leslie Flannery
10) How the Hell Did I Get Here? by Arie Kaplan
11) Night of Reflection by Chris Cambria
12) Xs and O’Briens by George Krubski
13) Jackson Hole by Don Balch
14) Sanctuary by Chris Cobb
15) Buried Secrets by Carlos Calvo
16) Grave Consequences by Curt Burdick & Scott Burdick
17) Lions by Dave Hackett
18) Ritornare by Mark Porro
19) Middle Man by Jay Curcuru
20) Mortal Coil by Andrew Steven Harris
21) Virgin Marie by Krista Zumbrink
22) Kung Fu Movie 3 by JD Hoang

That's it, y'all! Remember to get those scripts into us by midnight Sunday 4/15 at www.writerstorm.com. One of you could be struttin' proud real soon!

Love to all,

Portia Jefferson

Friday, April 06, 2007

Interview with WOTS finalist Ned Beedie

Our friend Frederick Mensch from www.moviebytes.com, the number one go-to resource for screenplay contests, recently did an interview with 2006 Writers on the Storm Top 3 finalist Ned Beedie. We thought we'd post it here, too. Congrats on the publicity, Ned! You deserve it!

MovieBytes Interview: Screenwriter Ned Beedie
=================================================================
An interview with screenwriter Ned Beedie regarding the Century City Writing Competition.
Q: What's the title of the script you entered in this contest, and what's it about?

A: The Dollmaker.

The logline is: Mike Broyles is a recently disgraced reporter -- think Jayson Blair from the NY Times. He returns to his hometown to rethink his life when the body of a missing 8 year-old boy turns up hanging from a tree.
Mike begins to uncover evidence that links this killing to a series of unsolved murders from fifteen years ago -- the Dollmaker killings.

Of course, with his credibility shot, no one believes Mike. That is, except for the murderer himself, who now knows that somebody is on to him. Mike has a chance on a story that could redeem his life and career -- if he lives long enough to write it.

Q: What made you enter this particular contest? Have you entered any other contests with this script? If so, how did you do?

A: I enter any and all contests that I can. I figure the more exposure, the better.

Yes, I have. -Semi-finalist in the Writer's Network Competition
-1st Place Winner in the Century City Screenwriting Competition
-2nd Runner Up in Writers on the Storm Competition -1 of 40
scripts selected for the fall '06 IFP Market, NYC -Semifinalist
in the Screenwriting Expo Contest -Honorable mention for the
IndieProducer.Com Screenwriting Competition -Semifinalist in
American Accolades Competition -Quarterfinalist in American
Screenwriting Competition -First Round Placement in 20/20
Competition -Quarterfinalist in Page Screenplay Competition

Q: Were you satisfied with the adminstration of the contest? Did they meet their deadlines? Did you receive all the awards that were promised?

A: I was very satisfied with all the contests I entered except one. I had an extremely bad encounter with the administrator of that particular competition and would never recommend it to anyone. Otherwise, all went very well. I received everything promised and got many meetings and readings from them.

Q: Were you given any feedback on your script? If so, did you find the feedback helpful?

A: I've been given a TON of feedback on the script. I have a completely new draft that tries to take many of these notes into account. I've only had a few people read this new version so it's still untested. I don't know if it works or if too many cooks in the kitchen undid what I was trying to achieve.

Q: Has your success in this contest helped you market your script? Were you contacted by any agents, managers or producers?

A: Yes, it has helped market it. I've been approached by all three but yet to sign with anyone, much to my frustration.

Q: What's your background? Have you written any other screenplays or television scripts?

A: I have a Master's Degree in Screenwriting from the American Film Institute. I have written other screenplays, optioned two and am working in the industry full time on various projects...though am ready to take my game up a notch or two.

Q: Do you live in Los Angeles? If not, do you have any plans to move there?

A: Yes, I don't think you can truly succeed in this business unless you do. So much of it is about bumping into people at the gym or Starbucks, or knowing a friend who has a sister who's an agent and volunteers to pass along your script. Obviously,
writing and the material matter. But, unfortunately, that can only take you so far and it's the relationships you build that sustain you.

Q: What's next? Are you working on a new script?

A: I'm currently working on two new scripts. I have a website:
www.NedJamesBeedie.com that describes best what I'm doing, who I am and where I'm going. Thanks!